|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10174/32851
|
Title: | Active Learning Strategies in the Veterinary Medicine Programme under the Think4Jobs Project |
Authors: | Payan-Carreira, Rita Rebelo, Hugo Sebastião, Luís |
Editors: | Ortega-Sánchez, Delfín |
Keywords: | skills development competency-based education work-based learning university-business collaboration learning activities clinical reasoning critical thinking |
Issue Date: | 22-Aug-2022 |
Publisher: | IntechOpen |
Citation: | Payan-Carreira, R., Rebelo, H., & Sebastião, L. (2022). Active Learning Strategies in the Veterinary Medicine Programme under the Think4Jobs Project. In (Ed.), Active Learning - Research and Practice for STEAM and Social Sciences Education [Working Title]. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.105969 |
Abstract: | Active learning has been introduced in the Universities to reinforce the students’
skills development and increase their motivation and engagement while also fostering the transferability of knowledge into the profession, contrasting with a classical
approach, where passive knowledge transfer occurs, and students act as sponges
for information. Albeit not completely conceptualized, active learning demands
the student’s involvement with the learning activities, the analysis and ability to
respond to specific situations, and a critical reflection on the learning process. In
Health Sciences, case-based and cooperative learning are among the most used active
learning strategies. They present multiple configurations and vary greatly in terms
of implementation. Students’ adherence to active learning depends on the perceived
utility, level of effort requested by the activities, and self-confidence in the quality of
achieved learning. Under the Think4Jobs, an Erasmus+ project, a University-Business
collaboration was implemented to design work-based activities for pilot courses of
the Veterinary Medicine program aiming to increase the students’ adherence to active
learning strategies while reducing any mismatch in students’ competencies at graduation. In this chapter, we propose discussing how the collaboration was conceptualized
and implemented. We also present some activities jointly designed to foster students’
clinical reasoning/critical thinking and decision-making. |
URI: | https://www.intechopen.com/online-first/83079 http://hdl.handle.net/10174/32851 |
Type: | bookPart |
Appears in Collections: | CIEP - Publicações - Capítulos de Livros
|
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
|