|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10174/33577
|
Title: | Perceptions and risk behaviors regarding biological invasions in inland aquatic ecosystems |
Authors: | Banha, Filipe Diniz, António M. Olivo de Amo, Rosa Oliva-Paterna, Francisco J. Anastácio, Pedro M. |
Editors: | Dewil, Raf Evans, Jason Zhang, Lixiao |
Keywords: | Awareness Invasive alien species Estuaries Freshwater Human health Socioeconomics |
Issue Date: | 2022 |
Publisher: | Elsevier |
Citation: | Banha, F., Diniz, A. M., Olivo del Amo, R., Oliva-Paterna, F., & Anastácio, P. M. (2022). Perceptions and risk behaviors regarding biological invasions in inland aquatic ecosystems. Journal of Environmental Management, 308, 114632. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114632 |
Abstract: | Public engagement is vital to effectively manage Invasive Alien Species (IAS) and biosecurity campaigns directed
to stakeholders are decisive to raise awareness regarding IAS regulations and problems. To design and implement
adequate communication plans, stakeholders’ perceptions and risk behaviors regarding IAS need to be monitored
by surveys. IAS do not recognize borders and most countries are not biogeographically isolated. Therefore, in
ternational
information and consensus are necessary when applying measures at a biogeographic scale. Our
bilingual survey was performed at the Iberian Peninsula, targeting the general public, decision-makers and other
stakeholders, covering all taxa associated to inland aquatic ecosystems. We found differences in IAS’ awareness
between countries, and between different stakeholder groups. Results showed that the awareness of socioeco
nomic
and human health impacts is substantially lower when compared with impacts on biodiversity. We found
that the perception regarding the predation impacts is consistent across groups and countries, while other per
ceptions
differ. The negative socioeconomic impact on angling due to IAS introductions is widely recognized.
However, angling is also the activity most referred as positively impacted by IAS due to fish introductions. Most
responders knew what IAS are, providing correct species examples. For all three awareness types (Biodiversity,
Socio-economic and Human health) the model regressions showed that the most important predictor was the
country of provenance of the respondent, followed by Education level for the socio-economic and biodiversity
regressions and the stakeholder group in the Human health regression. We can conclude that in Portugal and
Spain the general public and other key target-groups have reduced understanding of some threats posed by IAS.
We highlight that raising awareness about IAS impacts on humans, namely on socio-economic aspects and
human health, may be more effective and it is certainly needed in education campaigns towards IAS. |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10174/33577 |
Type: | article |
Appears in Collections: | PSI - Publicações - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais Com Arbitragem Científica
|
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
|