Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

Title: Maintaining natural and traditional cultural green infrastructures across Europe: learning from historic and current landscape transformations
Authors: Angelstam, Per
Manton, Michael
Yalmelynets, Taras
Fedoriak, Mariia
Albulescu, Andra-Cosmina
Bravo, Felipe
Cruz, Fátima
Jaroscewicz, Bogdan
Kavtarishvili, Marika
Muñoz-Rojas, José
Sijtsma, Frans
Washbourne, Carla-Leanne
Agnoletti, Mauro
Dobrynin, Denis
Izakovicova, Zita
Jansson, Nicklas
Kanka, Robert
Kopperoinen, Leena
Lazdinis, Marius
Metzger, Marc
Van der Moolen, Bert
Ozut, Deniz
Pavlovska Georgiieva, Dori
Stryamets, Natalya
Tolunay, Ahmet
Turkoglu, Turkay
Zagidullina, Asyia
Keywords: Cultural landscape
Forest naturalness
Green infrastructure
Landscape history
Land- sharing and land-sparing
Social-ecological system
Reference landscape
Issue Date: 8-Dec-2020
Publisher: Springer
Citation: Angelstam, P. et al (2020). Maintaining natural and traditional cultural green infrastructures across Europe: learning from historic and current landscape transformations.Landscape Ecology, 27 pp.
Abstract: Context Maintaining functional green infrastruc-tures (GIs) require evidence-based knowledge about historic and current states and trends of representative land cover types. Objectives We address: (1) the long-term loss and transformation of potential natural forest vegetation; (2) the effects of site productivity on permanent forest loss and emergence of traditional cultural landscapes; (3) the current management intensity; and (4) the social-ecological contexts conducive to GI maintenance. Methods We selected 16 case study regions, each with a local hotspot landscape, ranging from intact forest landscapes, via contiguous and fragmented forest covers, to severe forest loss. Quantitative open access data were used to estimate (i) the historic change and (ii) transformation of land covers, and (iii) compare the forest canopy loss from 2000 to 2018. Qualitative narratives about each hotspot landscape were analysed for similarities (iv). Results While the potential natural forest vegetation cover in the 16 case study regions had a mean of 86%, historically it has been reduced to 34%. Higher site productivity coincided with transformation to non- forest land covers. The mean annual forest canopy loss for 2000–2018 ranged from 0.01 to 1.08%.The 16 case studies represented five distinct social-ecological contexts (1) radical transformation of landscapes, (2) abuse of protected area concepts, (3) ancient cultural landscapes (4) multi-functional forests, and (5) intensive even-aged forest management, of which 1 and 4 was most common. Conclusions GIs encompass both forest naturalness and traditional cultural landscapes. Our review of Pan-European regions and landscapes revealed similarities in seemingly different contexts, which can support knowledge production and learning about how to sustain GIs.
Type: article
Appears in Collections:MED - Publicações - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais Com Arbitragem Científica
GEO - Publicações - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais Com Arbitragem Científica

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
Angelstam2020_Article_MaintainingNaturalAndTradition.pdf2.59 MBAdobe PDFView/OpenRestrict Access. You can Request a copy!
FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInDiggGoogle BookmarksMySpaceOrkut
Formato BibTex mendeley Endnote Logotipo do DeGóis 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.


Dspace Dspace
DSpace Software, version 1.6.2 Copyright © 2002-2008 MIT and Hewlett-Packard - Feedback
UEvora B-On Curriculum DeGois