Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10174/25928

Title: Laboratory Diagnosis of Brucellosis
Authors: Saavedra, Maria José
Fernandes, Conceição
Queiroga, Cristina
Editors: Simões, João Carlos Caetano
Saavedra, Maria José
Hunter, Pamela A.
Keywords: Bacterial methods
Direct tests
Indirect tests
Molecular methods
Serological methods
Issue Date: 2019
Publisher: Nova Science Publishers, Inc. † New York
Citation: Maria José Saavedra, Conceição Fernandes, and Cristina Queiroga (2019). Laboratory Diagnosis of Brucellosis” in Brucellosis in goats and sheep”. Editors: J. C. Caetano Simões, M. J. Saavedra, P. A. Hunter. Publisher: Nova Science Publishers, Inc., New York, USA. ISBN: 978-1-53614-962-3: 151-180.
Abstract: This chapter addresses the different methods used to diagnose brucellosis. Rapid diagnosis of the disease is essential for its control and to protect public health. Basically, there are two types of tests, the direct tests, which detect the presence of Brucella and are used in clinical situations where the animals are affected and show clinical signs, and indirect tests that are mainly used for screening to detect subclinical conditions. These are widely used as part of control and eradication programs. Main aspects of direct tests are described, namely bacterial isolation and identification and molecular methods: conventional and real-time PCR, multiple locus variable-number tandem repeat analysis, multi-locus sequence typing and luminex xMAP technology. Regarding indirect tests, serological tests are prefered: milk ring test, buffered Brucella antigen tests, namely rose Bengal test and buffered plate agglutination test, serum agglutination test, complement fixation test, indirect and competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays, fluorescence polarization assay, immunoprecipitation tests and lateral flow immunochromatography. Another indirect test, interferon-gamma release assay, performed on whole blood and brucellin skin tests are discussed. Concerning sensitivity (DSe) and specificity (DSp) of the methods, none of the tests are Brucella species-specific, but some of those, specifically the buffered agglutination tests, set a high standard with regards to the DSe/DSp. Although no current serological test provides enough DSe for the 100% DSp required, some test combinations can be of great help.
URI: https://novapublishers.com/shop/brucellosis-in-goats-and-sheep-an-endemic-and-re-emerging-old-zoonosis-in-the-21st-century/
http://hdl.handle.net/10174/25928
Type: bookPart
Appears in Collections:MVT - Publicações - Capítulos de Livros

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
Chapter 8_LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS OF BRUCELLOSIS.pdf646.09 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInDiggGoogle BookmarksMySpaceOrkut
Formato BibTex mendeley Endnote Logotipo do DeGóis 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

Dspace Dspace
DSpace Software, version 1.6.2 Copyright © 2002-2008 MIT and Hewlett-Packard - Feedback
UEvora B-On Curriculum DeGois