|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10174/25182
|
Title: | Collaborative Networking of Researchers in Quality: A Portuguese Case |
Authors: | Pires, A. R. Saraiva, M. Rolo, A. |
Editors: | Berbegal-Mirabent, Jasmina Marimon, Frederic Casedesús, Martí |
Keywords: | Quality Network Collaborative Research. |
Issue Date: | Jul-2018 |
Publisher: | International Conference on Quality Engineering and Management |
Citation: | Pires, A.R., Saraiva, M., Rolo, A. (2018). “Collaborative Networking of Researchers in Quality: A Portuguese Case” in Proceedings Book of 3rd International Conference on Quality Engineering and Management 2018, Berbegal-Mirabent, Jasmina; Marimon, Frederic; Casedesús, Martí; Sampaio, Paulo (Eds), International Conference on Quality Engineering and Management, pp. 201-218. ISBN: 978-989-20-8521-0|| ISSN: 2184-3481. Universitat International de Catalunya, Barcelona (Spain), July 11-13, 2018.
http://icqem.dps.uminho.pt/icqem18_proceedingsbook.pdf |
Abstract: | Purpose – Experience of a Portuguese network of researchers in quality is presented, and future development is discussed based on literature related to business collaborative network.
Design/methodology/approach – Literature review based on company’s networks was used whenever applicable, and it was adapted to individual networks. A critical analysis of the network is carried out, bearing in mind development along its functioning during 9 years.
Findings – The experience shows some positive achievements (ex. a scientific journal), and some difficulties (ex: common projects). However, the most important issues for future sustainability are related to management dimensions like structure, strategy, earnings, relationships and performance.
Research limitations/implications- Higher Education Institutions are increasingly competing for resources and students. Small Research and Development (R&D) teams, such as quality, face relatively more difficulties than large ones. Collaborative networking can be a good solution.
Practical implications- Conclusions and reflection may interest other countries and regions.
Social implications- The weak mutual knowledge among quality researchers, as well as the lack of synergies between groups and individuals, can be a seriously weak point for development and scientific production. Coopetition can be possible and advantageous.
Originality/value- Research on quality issues is often carried out in small R&D teams. Collaborative networking can improve both theoretical and practical development. |
URI: | http://icqem.dps.uminho.pt/icqem18_proceedingsbook.pdf http://hdl.handle.net/10174/25182 |
ISBN: | 978-989-20-8521-0 |
ISSN: | 2184-3481 |
Type: | article |
Appears in Collections: | GES - Artigos em Livros de Actas/Proceedings
|
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
|