Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10174/41829
|
| Title: | Conflicting rationalities limit scientific uptake in spatial conservation prioritization |
| Authors: | BASTOS ARAUJO, MIGUEL |
| Issue Date: | 31-Mar-2025 |
| Publisher: | Nature Reviews Biodiversity |
| Citation: | Araújo, M.B. 2025. Conflicting rationalities limit scientific uptake in spatial conservation prioritization. Nature Reviews Biodiversity. 1: 279-281. |
| Abstract: | Spatial conservation prioritization offers a scientific framework for decision-making, yet its practical uptake remains limited. Here, I argue that incorporating social and political dimensions into conservation prioritization — rather than focusing solely on technical and economic aspects — would enhance progress towards biodiversity targets by ensuring closer alignment with real-world governance dynamics. |
| URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10174/41829 |
| Type: | article |
| Appears in Collections: | MED - Publicações - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais Com Arbitragem Científica
|
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
|
/
MED - Instituto Mediterrâneo para Agricultura, Ambiente e Desenvolvimento /
MED - Publicações - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais Com Arbitragem Científica /
