|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10174/23141
|
Title: | One Health-ness Evaluation of Cysticercosis Surveillance Design in Portugal |
Authors: | Fonseca, Ana Gloria Torgal, Jorge de Meneghi, Daniele Gabriël, Sarah Coelho, Ana Cláudia Vilhena, Manuela Vilhena, Manuela |
Editors: | Buttigieg, Sandra |
Keywords: | One Health case study neglected disease surveillance evaluation cysticercosis, |
Issue Date: | 13-Mar-2018 |
Publisher: | Frontiers in Public Health |
Citation: | Fonseca AG, Torgal J, de Meneghi D,
Gabriël S, Coelho AC and Vilhena M
(2018) One Health-ness Evaluation
of Cysticercosis Surveillance
Design in Portugal.
Front. Public Health 6:74.
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00074 |
Abstract: | The increasing occurrence of human cysticercosis, a zoonotic neglected disease, is challenging the traditional prevention and control paradigm and calling for One Health (OH) solutions in industrialized countries. OH solutions for health interventions are increasingly being used to capture expected and unexpected outcomes across people, animals and the environment. The Network for One Health Evaluation (NEOH) proposes an evidence-based framework, relying on systems and mixed methods approaches to evaluate the One Healthness. In this case study, this tool is used to evaluate the design of the Observatory of Taeniasis and Cysticercosis, as an example of inter-sectorial collaboration for surveillance in Portugal. The OH initiative (drivers, expected outcomes) and its system (boundaries, aim, dimensions, actors, stakeholders) were described. The different aspects of this initiative were scored with values from 0 (=no OH approach) to 1 (=perfect OH approach). The OH index was 0.31. Its OH ratio is 1.98. Overall scores were: OH thinking 0.75; OH planning 0.60; OH working 0.60; OH sharing 0.35; OH learning 0.50 and Systemic organization 0.50. Operational levels of the Initiative are the main strengths, indicating a comprehensive multidimensional innovative approach and transdisciplinarity. Critical issues in the supporting infrastructure were observed, related to communication, learning and organizational gaps in the project, with the evaluation being conducted as the project is being designed and implemented. The strengths and weaknesses detected may be used to refine the initiative. This case study therefore exemplifies and supports OH assessment also for ongoing projects, at design and early implementation stages for guiding and guaranteeing a OH oriented perspective. |
URI: | https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00074 http://hdl.handle.net/10174/23141 |
ISSN: | 2296-2565 |
Type: | article |
Appears in Collections: | MED - Publicações - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais Com Arbitragem Científica
|
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
|