Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

Title: An extended value-based argumentation framework for ontology mapping with confidence degrees
Authors: Santos, Cássia
Quaresma, Paulo
Vieira, Renata
Keywords: argumentation
ontology mapping
Issue Date: May-2007
Publisher: Springer
Abstract: Heuristics to combine different approaches for ontology mapping have been proposed in the literature. This paper proposes to use abstract argumentation frameworks to combine such approaches. We extend the Value-based Argumentation Framework (VAF)[2], in order to represent arguments with confidence degrees. Our agents apply individual mapping algorithms and cooperate in order to exchange their local results (arguments). Next, based on their preferences and confidence of the arguments, the agents compute their preferred mapping sets. The arguments in such preferred sets are viewed as the set of globally acceptable arguments.
Type: article
Appears in Collections:INF - Artigos em Livros de Actas/Proceedings

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
argmas07.pdfArtigo140.51 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInDiggGoogle BookmarksMySpaceOrkut
Formato BibTex mendeley Endnote Logotipo do DeGóis 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.


Dspace Dspace
DSpace Software, version 1.6.2 Copyright © 2002-2008 MIT and Hewlett-Packard - Feedback
UEvora B-On Curriculum DeGois