<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>DSpace Collection:</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/10174/5271</link>
    <description />
    <pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2026 22:41:58 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:date>2026-04-05T22:41:58Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Thermal conductivity of concrete at high temperatures for thermal energy storage applications: Experimental analysis</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/10174/30118</link>
      <description>Title: Thermal conductivity of concrete at high temperatures for thermal energy storage applications: Experimental analysis
Authors: Lucio-Martin, T.; Roig-Flores, M.; Izquierdo, M.; Alonso, M.C.
Abstract: Thermal conductivity plays an important role in energy storage when the materials are charging and discharging.&#xD;
This paper presents an experimental investigation of the evolution of thermal conductivity up to 600 ◦C in&#xD;
different concretes. Moreover, the thermal conductivity was measured during thermal fatigue cycles when&#xD;
temperature ranged between 300 and 600 ◦C, simulating the operation conditions in a storage system of molten&#xD;
salts in a Concentrating Solar Power Plant (CSP). Five concrete compositions were analysed using diverse types of&#xD;
aggregates with different thermal response, covering a wide range of the initial thermal conductivity. The results&#xD;
confirm that the loss of thermal conductivity with temperature during the first heating is mainly due to the free&#xD;
water loss. Moreover, the type of aggregate influences the overall thermal performance of concrete due to its&#xD;
thermal conductivity and the volumetric differences with the cement paste. Siliceous aggregates underwent the&#xD;
highest decrease of thermal conductivity of concrete (+50%) with regard to room temperature. Regarding the&#xD;
cooling phase, thermal conductivity recovers between 20% and 40% depending on the type of aggregate. The&#xD;
outcomes of the present study demonstrate that the assumption of a constant thermal conductivity value in&#xD;
numerical simulations to predict its thermal capacity for energy storage is not appropriate.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2020 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/10174/30118</guid>
      <dc:date>2020-12-25T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

