<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/10174/582">
    <title>DSpace Collection:</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/10174/582</link>
    <description />
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/10174/39883" />
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <dc:date>2026-04-06T09:11:17Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
  <item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/10174/39883">
    <title>Timing of A.I. is critical for fertility in lactating dairy cows</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/10174/39883</link>
    <description>Title: Timing of A.I. is critical for fertility in lactating dairy cows
Authors: Fricke, Paul; Santos, Vanda; Carvalho, Paulo
Editors: Anderson, Kylene
Abstract: ONE of the most common questions we get about&#xD;
breeding dairy cows involves the importance of insemination timing for cows identified&#xD;
with increased activity using an automated activity monitoring system or submitted to timed A.I. after a synchronization protocol. Farms have widely adopted these technologies,&#xD;
and achieve optimal fertility to A.I., both require that the timing of A.I. occurs within a given time window, either relative to increased activity or induction of ovulation&#xD;
after the final GnRH treatment.&#xD;
We recently published a paper in the Journal of Dairy Science in which we present three data sets; one that is a randomized controlled study, and two other large observational data sets on timing of A.I.&#xD;
relative to induction of ovulation after a double-ovsynch protocol or after an estrus alert using an automated activity monitoring system. Let’s look at what we found.</description>
    <dc:date>2025-08-31T23:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
</rdf:RDF>

