<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>DSpace Collection:</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/10174/14329" />
  <subtitle />
  <id>http://hdl.handle.net/10174/14329</id>
  <updated>2026-08-05T06:08:51Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-08-05T06:08:51Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>Game Theoretical Aspects Towards a Sustainable Path to Fight Climate Change</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/10174/39607" />
    <author>
      <name>Rocha de Sousa, Miguel</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://hdl.handle.net/10174/39607</id>
    <updated>2025-11-17T15:20:41Z</updated>
    <published>2025-06-30T23:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Game Theoretical Aspects Towards a Sustainable Path to Fight Climate Change
Authors: Rocha de Sousa, Miguel
Abstract: We provide a new form of re-globalization tackling the aspects of climate change&#xD;
by addressing it through a theoretical approach rooted in game theory. A first holistic&#xD;
game of Berlin—between the individual and the group—is presented, grounded&#xD;
in Isaiah Berlin’s (Berlin (1961)) concepts of negative and positive liberty. Next, we&#xD;
generalize a non-cooperative game of climate change. Building on an evolutionary&#xD;
game theory approach (Caleiro et al., 2019), we propose a novel framework. We&#xD;
then explore cooperative games and introduce the notion of Kantian equilibrium&#xD;
as developed by Roemer (2019). Finally, we discuss the intertemporal politicaleconomic&#xD;
approach to climate change in the context of an overlapping generations&#xD;
(OLG) model, as in Rocha de Sousa and Pica (2023). We conclude with conjectures&#xD;
on global climate governance, drawing from simulations of global ecological&#xD;
footprints (Araújo et al., 2025).</summary>
    <dc:date>2025-06-30T23:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>An OLG model approach to climate change with intergenerational concern and Game Theory</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/10174/37128" />
    <author>
      <name>Rocha de Sousa, Miguel</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Pica, António</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://hdl.handle.net/10174/37128</id>
    <updated>2024-07-23T08:42:47Z</updated>
    <published>2023-07-20T23:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: An OLG model approach to climate change with intergenerational concern and Game Theory
Authors: Rocha de Sousa, Miguel; Pica, António
Abstract: Udalov 2014 extended a collective goods problem through an Overlapping Generations Model where there&#xD;
is a decision regarding the type of energy use either fossil fuel versus renewable use energy Udalov&#xD;
introduced a politico economic equilibrium contingent on the effort or commitment on renewable energy We&#xD;
provide his framework but further extended it, by using an eta parameter which provides intergenerational&#xD;
concern among different generations, old versus youngsters We depart from non existent Udalov non&#xD;
concern of intergenerational generations, and extend it to use a parameter eta which reflects this concern&#xD;
We further provide a game, in the sense of game theory, where the politico economic equilibrium is&#xD;
contingent on the intergenerational concern, which reflects strategic interaction among youngsters and old&#xD;
people Some politico economic results at hand As higher intergenerational concern eta parameter a tribute&#xD;
to Stern’s 2004 report the faster the pace of recuperation of a global common good the lower level of&#xD;
pollution and politico economic equilibria recovers the fastest ( the investment in renewable energy</summary>
    <dc:date>2023-07-20T23:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Kant vs Nash: Solving the Global Commons Goods Problem</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/10174/37125" />
    <author>
      <name>Rocha de Sousa, Miguel</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Duarte, Vanessa</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://hdl.handle.net/10174/37125</id>
    <updated>2024-07-23T08:41:37Z</updated>
    <published>2023-07-16T23:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Kant vs Nash: Solving the Global Commons Goods Problem
Authors: Rocha de Sousa, Miguel; Duarte, Vanessa
Abstract: We provide the notion of Kantian equilibrium versus Nash equilibrium, and try to recover the efficiency of Pareto&#xD;
allocations within public goods (global commons) and external effects (like pollution) Nash 1950 a,b) provided the first solution to&#xD;
a non zero sum non cooperative game through a fixed point theorem Nevertheless, market efficiency is not recovered when there&#xD;
are either externalities (like pollution, or the global common problems), or common public goods Ostrom 1989 provided a&#xD;
solution in small numbers through cooperation in small lake ponds and lobsters aquaculture production and local water provision&#xD;
Roemer 1992 studied theories of distributive justice and came forth with a solution to global commons problem of environment&#xD;
and pollution ( 2019 Nevertheless, Roemer’s solution, while solving the global commons incentive problem, by thinking&#xD;
out of the box, and providing a new framework provides a too much collective solution We provide instead a communitarian&#xD;
solution, inspired by Christian ethics, namely Economics of Francis, Laudatio si which also recovers the global incentive problem,&#xD;
but provides a different politico economic perspective.</summary>
    <dc:date>2023-07-16T23:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Kant vs Nash: Solving the Global Commons Goods Problem</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/10174/37124" />
    <author>
      <name>Rocha de Sousa, Miguel</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Duarte, Vanessa</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://hdl.handle.net/10174/37124</id>
    <updated>2024-07-23T08:41:34Z</updated>
    <published>2023-07-19T23:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Kant vs Nash: Solving the Global Commons Goods Problem
Authors: Rocha de Sousa, Miguel; Duarte, Vanessa
Abstract: We provide the notion of Kantian equilibrium versus Nash equilibrium, a try to recover the efficiency of Pareto allocations within public goods (global commons) and external effects (like pollution). Nash (1950a,b) provided the first solution to a non zero-sum  non-cooperative game through a fixed point theorem. Nevertheless, market efficiency is not recovered when there are either externalities (like pollution, or the global common problems and goods), or common public goods. Ostrom (1989) provided a solution in small numbers through cooperation in small lake ponds and lobsters aquaculture production and local water provision. &#xD;
&#xD;
Roemer (1992) studied theories of distributive justice and came forth with a solution to global commons problem of environment and pollution (Roemer, 2019). Nevertheless, Roemer’s solution, while solving the global commons incentive problem, by thinking out of the box, and providing a new framework provides a too much collective solution. We provide instead a communitarian solution, inspired Christian ethics, namely Economy of Francis, Laudation si, which also recovers the global incentive problem, but provides a different politico economic perspective.</summary>
    <dc:date>2023-07-19T23:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

